Damage Effects of Fluid filled Submunitions by High Velocity Projectile Impact

  • Zan Yang State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing - 100 081, People R China
  • Wang Hai-fu State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing -100081, People R. China
  • Zheng Yuan-feng State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People R. China
  • Yu Qing-bo State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, People R. China
Keywords: Hit-to-kill, Simplified payload, Explosively formed projectile, Yaw angle

Abstract

A series of tests investigating the damage effects of fluid-filled submunitions by high velocity projectile impact were conducted. An analytical model is presented, in which the yaw angle of the projectile was taken into account. Based on the analytical model, the influence of the strike angle, hit-point offset distance and projectile length to diameter ratio on submunition damage ratio were predicted. The analytical results showed a good agreement with the experiments. The submunition damage ratio strongly depends on the hit-point offset distance, showing a significant decrease with increasing hit-point offset distance. For large hit-point offset distance, increasing the length to diameter ratio of the projectile will effectively improve the submunition damage ratio. There is an appropriate yaw angle of the projectile in which the submunition damage ratio will be maximal.

References

Lloyd, R.M. Physics of direct hit and near miss warhead technology. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2001, pp. 31. ISBN 1-56347-473-5.

Espino, L. Computer modeling for damage assessment of KE-Rod warhead against ballistic missile. graduate school of the University of Texas at El-Paso, July, 2004.

Lloyd, R.M. Near miss warhead technology with multiple effects against submunition payloads. In 9th Annual AIAA/BMDO Technology Conference, Osaka, July, 2000.

Louie, N. & Hambleton, J. Multi-dimensional analysis of TMD lethality data. Boeing North American Canoga Park CA Rocketdyne Div., Los Angeles, USA, 1998.

Willis, J. Missile defense: Sorting out collateral damage. Army Space Journal, Spring/Summer Edition, 2011, pp. 44-49.

Hildreth, S.A. Kinetic energy kill for ballistic missile defense: A status overview. Congressional Research Service Reports, 2007.

Liu, J.; Long, Y.; Ji, C.; Liu, Q.; Zhong, M. & ge, S. Ballistic performance study on the composite structures of multi-layered targets subjected to high velocity impact by copper EFP. Compos. Struct., 2017, 184, 484-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.072.

Forrestal, M.J. & Piekutowski, A.J. Penetration experiments with 6061-T6511 aluminum targets and spherical-nose steel projectiles at striking velocities between 0.5 and 3.0 km/s. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2000, 24(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00033-0.

Arnold, W. & Rottenkolber, E. Lethality enhancer against TBMs with demanding submunition payloads, In 24th International symposium on ballistics. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA: 2008, pp. 1027-1034.

Carver, D.; Campbell, L. & Roebuck, B. Large-scale, hypervelocity, high-fidelity interceptor lethality development in AEDC's range g. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2008, 35(12), 1459-1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.036.

Melchor-Lucero, O. & Carrasco, C. J. Computational technique to assess warhead lethality against ballistic missile. J. Aerospace Eng., 2009, 22(4), 354-364.

Chang, Y. Hydrocode analysis at APL, Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, 1998, 19(1), 73.

Baudin gallic, C. & Rouquand, A. Lethality criteria to defeat ballistic missile HE and chemical payloads. French Ministry of Defense, France, 2004.

Børvik, T.; Langseth, M.; Hopperstad, O.S. & Malo, K.A. Perforation of 12 mm thick steel plates by 20-mm diameter projectiles with flat, hemispherical and conical noses: Part I:experimental study. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2002, 27(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00034-3.

McHenry, M. R.; Levin, M. A. & Orphal, D. L. Estimating optimum hit-to-kill vehicle configurations for lethality against submunition payloads. In 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, Jan 1998. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-831.

Doup, P. W. Endgame analyses against a ballistic missile aparametric study, TNO Defense, Security and Safety, 2005.

Jin, X.; Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; gong, J.; Zheng, Y. & Wang, H. Lethality analytical model of hit-to-kill kinetic kill vehicle against submunition payloads. T. B. Inst. Techno.,2015, 35(10), 1016-1021. https://doi.org/10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2015.10.006.

Karpp, R. lethality estimates of two different kill vehicles based on SPHINX hydrocode simulation. Raytheon Electronic Company,1996.

Warren, T.L. & Poormon, K.L. Penetration of 6061-T6511 aluminum targets by ogive-nosed VAR 4340 steel projectiles at oblique angles: Experiments and simulations. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2001, 25(10),993-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00024-0.

Yaziv, D.; Walker, J.D. & Riegel, J.P. Analytical model of yawed penetration in the 0 to 90 degrees eange. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Ballistics, Stockholm, Sweden, 1992, 3, 17-23.

Behner, T.; Hohler, V.; Anderson Jr, C.E. & Goodlin, D. Influence of yaw angle on the penetration reduction of long rods in oblique targets. In 20th International Symposium on Ballistics, Orlando, Florida, 2002, pp. 834.

Schonberg, W.P.; Bean, A.J. & Darzi, K. Hypervelocity impact physics, NASA-CR-4343, January, 1991.

Wilbeck, J. S.; Herwig, S. B.; Kilpatrick, J. M.; Faux, D.R.; Weir, R.J.; Hertel, E.S. & Dutta, M.K. Hypervelocity impact of spaced plates by a mock kill vehicle. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2001, 26(1), 853-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00139-7.

Nutting, J. Frequently asked questions, www.canmaker.com, 2011.

Cardoso, D. & Teixeira-Dias, F. Modelling the formation of explosively formed projectiles (EFP). Int. J. Impact Eng., 2016, 93, 116-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.02.014.

li, R.; li, W. & Wang, X. Effects of control parameters of three-point initiation on the formation of an explosively formed projectile with fins. Shock Waves, 2017, 28(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-017-0725-9.

Hu, F.; Wu, H.; Fang, Q.; liu, J.; liang, B. & Kong, X. Impact performance of explosively formed projectile (EFP) into concrete targets. Int. J. Impact Eng., 2017, 109, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.06.010.

Luttwak, G. Oblique and yawed rod penetration. In 5th International Symposium on Behaviour of Dense Media under High Dynamic Pressures, HDP5, France, 23-27 Jun, 2003.

Published
2020-02-10
How to Cite
YangZ., Hai-fuW., Yuan-fengZ., & Qing-boY. (2020). Damage Effects of Fluid filled Submunitions by High Velocity Projectile Impact. Defence Science Journal, 70(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.70.12974
Section
Combat Engineering