Energy Conservation Method Combining Anti spray Rail and Wedge Flap for High speed Displacement Hulls
Abstract
The hydrodynamic mechanism and parametric influences of the wedge flap and the anti-spray rail in combination is investigates. A methodology with specific guidelines for incorporating these appendages with significant drag reduction is provided. Small crafts designs frequently require interventional changes to realise the desired guaranteed speed with their installed engine power. The appendages namely, the wedge, flap and anti-spray rails are used as retrofit measures or adapted in new hull forms, in isolation or in combination, to improve the drag and bring down the power requirement. A judicious combination of different appendages can result in significantly reduced drag and therefore power saving. The methodology combines the results of numerical and experimental investigations. The systematic study identifies the parameters for control namely, wedge flap size in terms of the chord length, its orientation vide the angle of the wedge flap, and the anti-spray rail location with respect to the water surface. The choice of the size of the wedge flap is a constrained problem since excessive wedge flap can cause problems related to length and hydrodynamic loading. This study establishes a solution by combination of a minimum integrated wedge flap with properly located anti-spray rail to reduce the drag. The study shows favourable influences due to local pressure and numerical results using a RANSE solver show good comparison with experimental test results. The methodology is a new approach towards drag reduction in new designs as well as drag control by retrofit.
References
Muller, G.B. The effect of an advanced spray rail system on resistance and development of spray of semi-displacement round bilge hulls, FAST 91. In First International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Trondheim, Norway 1991 Jun 17
Gabor, K., Dominic , C. and Cheng Wen, L. (1999) 'Stern Wedges and Stern flaps for improved powering- U.S. Navy Experience', SNAME Transactions, Vol.107.
ITTC- Recommended Procedures and Guidelines– 7.5-03-02-01, “CFD, Resistance and flow, Uncertainty analysis in CFD, Examples of resistance and flow” – 1999
Bojovic , P. and Sahoo, P. (2000) 'Effect of stern wedges and advanced spray rail system on calm water resistance of high speed displacement hull forms', Proceedings of Sea Australia 2000, Sydney.
ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines – 7.5-02-02-01, ”Testing and Extrapolation of resistance test” – 2002
ITTC- Recommended Procedures and Guidelines– 7.5-03-01-01, “Uncertainty analysis in CFD, Verification and validation, Methodology and Procedures” – 2008
ITTC- Recommended Procedures and Guidelines– 7.5-03-02-03, “Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications” – 2011
Salas, and Tampier, G. (2013) 'Assessment of appendages effect on forward resistance reduction', Ship Science & Technology, Vol.7 (13), 37-45
ITTC- Recommended Procedures and Guidelines– 7.5-02-02-02.1, “Examples for uncertainty analysis of resistance tests in towing tank” – 2014
Where otherwise noted, the Articles on this site are licensed under Creative Commons License: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India