Design and Selection Criteria of Main Parachute for Re entry Space Payload

  • Mahendra Pratap DRDO-Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra - 282 001
  • Anil Kumar Agrawal Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi - 221 005
  • Swadesh Kumar DRDO-Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra - 282 001
Keywords: Drag force, Coefficient of drag, Filling time, Flight-path angle, Ringsail, Flat circular slotted canopy

Abstract

Parachutes are used as a decelerator in the re-entry, descent, and landing of space recovery payloads, providing
stability and desired descent rate for a safe landing. The selection of the main parachute is the most critical and
important part of the space module recovery system. Parachute size is restricted by the required landing speed,
materials, and weight of the payload. Parachute materials are selected based on the various forces experienced by
the parachute. An investigation has been carried out to design a parachute system which gives less impact velocity, less angle of oscillation and less impact load for the landing of a crew module. Therefore, in this paper, selection criteria for the main parachute have been discussed considering recovery of re-entry space payload of 500 kg (unmanned) and 3500 kg (manned) class. Based on analysis carried out on the parachute size, canopy filling time, velocity reduction, peak deceleration, and opening shock, authors have proposed a unique type of solid canopy with slots (slots of the minimum area equivalent to geometry porosity) for the main parachute rather than a complex ringsail or disk-band type canopy. With this new concept, the parachute has been designed, developed and qualified through testing, trials and maiden flight of space capsule in LEO and is propose to use in the next manned space mission program.

Author Biographies

Mahendra Pratap, DRDO-Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra - 282 001

Mr Mahendra Pratap has acquired his BE (Mech, Hons) from Moti Lal Nehru Regional Engineering College, Allahabad, in 1989 and MTech (IM) from IT BHU Varanasi, in 2008. Presently working as a Group Director (Para) at DRDO-Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra. The author also has worked in the field of reliability and quality assurance division. He has published 17 papers in seminars and conferences. He has been awarded Lab young scientist and Group Technology awards.

In the current study, he has designed the parachute system and also carried out the testing, packed life analysis as per space standard requirements. He has generated mathematical model and various testing using the solid canopy as the main decelerator and proposed configuration of canopy for better stability and drag coefficient.

Anil Kumar Agrawal, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi - 221 005

Professor A. K. Agrawal has obtained his BE (Mechanical Engineering) from MNREC Allahabad, in 1979, MTech and PhD from IIT Kanpur. At present, he is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering IIT(BHU) Varanasi India. His area of interest is reliability, quality control, mathematical modeling and simulation, six sigma, optimisation, industrial engineering. He has credits of many national and international papers.

In current the study, he has extended logistic support and overall guidance to formulate the mathematical equations and comparative analysis on parachute inflation time. He has also contributed to a literature survey on the related topics and reviewed the paper.

Swadesh Kumar, DRDO-Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra - 282 001

Mr Swadesh Kumar has obtained his MTech from IIT Kharagpur, India in the field of CFD analysis. At present, he is working as a scientist in parachute division, DRDO-Aerial Delivery Research & Development Establishment, Agra. He has designed various parachutes for unmanned aircrafts, recovery payloads etc. He has published many papers in seminars and conferences.
In the current study, he was associated in design, testing and fabrication of parachutes of 3500 kg re-entry payload. He has developed MATLAB program and simulated the various design parameters.

References

T.W.Knacke, “Apollo Parachute Landing System”, 2nd AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator System, 1968.

John Vincze, ‘Gemini Spacecraft Parachute Landing System’.

M.L.Sidana, “Design, Development and Validation of a Recovery System for a 500 kg Re-entry Payload”, 18th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, 2005-1638.

18th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, ‘Atmospheric Re-entry Demonstrator Descent and Recovery Sub-system Qualification Test’, 1997-1441.

Lingard, Course material “Heinrich Parachute Technology Short Course” May 2008, YUMA Arizona USA

F. Mohaghegh at al, “Parachute Filling Time: A Criterion to Classify parachute Types”, 19th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, 21-24 May 2007.

T. W. Knacke, ‘Parachute Recovery System Design Manual’, 1992.

Macha J.M., “A Simple, Approximate model for Parachute Inflation”, 10th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, 10-13 May 1993.

Cruz, Course material “Heinrich Parachute Technology Short Course” May 2008, YUMA Arizona USA.

Ludtke W.P., “Notes on a Generic Parachute Opening Force Analysis”, 9th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, 7-9 October 1986.

Tyagi J.K. and Kumar P., “Parametric Study of Unicross Parachute Under infinite and Finite Mass Conditions”, 11th AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar, 9-11 April 1991.

E.G.Ewing, 'Recovery System Design Guide’, 1978, Repot No. AFFDL-TR-78-151

Phillip R. Delurgio, 'Evolution of The Ringsail Parachute’, AIAA # 99-1700.

Published
2019-12-16
How to Cite
Pratap, M., Agrawal, A., & Kumar, S. (2019). Design and Selection Criteria of Main Parachute for Re entry Space Payload. Defence Science Journal, 69(6), 531-537. https://doi.org/10.14429/dsj.69.12681
Section
Aeronautical Systems

Most read articles by the same author(s)