Application of Metallic Strip Gratings for Enhancement of Electromagnetic Performance of A-sandwich Radome

Enhancement of the electromagnetic (EM) performance characteristics of A-sandwich radome wall over X-band using metallic strip gratings is presented in this work. Equivalent transmission line method in conjunction with equivalent circuit model (ECM) is used for modeling the A-sandwich radome panel with metallic strip gratings and the computation of radome performance parameters. Metallic strip grating embedded in the mid-plane of the core and those in the skin-core interface are the configurations considered in the present work. For a given thickness of metallic strip grating, its width and pitch are optimized at different angles of incidence such that the new radome wall configuration offers superior EM performance over the entire X-band as compared to the conventional A-sandwich wall. The EM analysis shows that the superior EM performance of A-sandwich with metallic strip gratings makes it suitable for the design of normal incidence and streamlined airborne radomes.

β                   Constant
εr                  Dielectric constant
Φ                  Electrical length
λ                    Wavelength
θ                    Incidence angle
A, B, C, D     Elements of transmission matrix
B                Shunt susceptance of the metallic strip gratings
Cn                  Coefficients of nth order
Ptr                  Power transmission coefficient
Prf                  Power reflection coefficient
P                     Pitch
tan δe             Electric loss tangent
tms                 Thickness of metallic strip
tc1                  Thickness of core for configuration 1
tc2                  Thickness of core for configuration 2
tp                   Thickness of radome paint layer
ts                    Thickness of skin layer
T1, T2              Voltage transmission coefficients
w                    Width of the strip
Z0                   Impedance of free space
Zc                   Impedance of core layer
Zp                   Impedance of paint layer
Zs                   Impedance of skin layer

The A-sandwich radome wall considered here is composed of three layers namely, outer skin, core and inner skin. The outer and inner skin layers are made of glass-epoxy, while the core is made of polyurethane foam. The core thickness is optimized for maximum power transmission over the X-band. In order to enhance the EM performance, the metallic strip gratings consisting of planar array of strips are either fixed on the surfaces or embedded in the layers. The design configurations with metallic strip gratings studied are:

(i)    metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core layer (Configuration1) and
(ii)   metallic strip gratings embedded in each skin-core interface (Configuration2).

Figure 1. Schematic of A-sandwich radome panel with metallic strip gratings (b) embedded in each skin-core interface (Configuration 2).

Figure 1. Schematic of A-sandwich radome panel with metallic strip gratings (b) embedded in each skin-core interface (Configuration 2).

For each configuration mentioned above as shown in Fig. 1, the optimum design parameters of the metallic strip gratings and radome .EM performance parameters are computed based on the equivalent transmission line method in conjunction with equivalent circuit model.

Further EM performance parameters (power transmission, power reflection and insertion phase delay) of both novel radome wall configurations with metallic strip gratings and A-sandwich alone structure are evaluated for perpendicular polarization over a range of incidence angles from normal incidence to high incidence angle 80°. The EM analysis shows that the A-sandwichradome wall with metallic strip gratings have superior EM performance as compared to conventional A-sandwich wall. The results indicate that these configurations have potential applications in the design of both normal incidence and highly streamlined airborne radomes.

The A-sandwich radome wall is composed of three layers namely, outer skin, core and inner skin. The outer and inner skin layers considered are made of glass-epoxy (dielectric constant, εr = 4; and loss tangent, tan δe = 0.015) with constant thickness of 0.75 mm for structural rigidity. The core is made of polyurethane foam (εr = 1.15 and tan δe = 0.005) with optimized thickness of 5.84 mm for maximum power transmission over the X-band. The surface of the outer skin layer is coated with a radome paint (εr = 3.46 and tan δe = 0.068) of thickness 0.2 mm. The metallic strip grating consists of a planar array of thin parallel strips of uniform cross-section. The thickness of the metallic strip is assumed to be very small (of the order of 0.1 mm).

Hence in the present work, the EM performance parameters are analyzed and reported only for perpendicular polarization, which is capable of catering to the worst-case scenarios.

The metallic strip grating incorporated A-sandwich radome wall is considered as an equivalent transmission line with different sections corresponding to slab and metallic strip grating structure (Fig. 1). The change in the characteristic impedance of the free space and A-sandwich wall is a major source of reflection of the wave incident on the structure. As compared to the free space, different layers of radome wall can be considered as low impedance lines connected end to end. Hence the whole configuration can be represented by a single matrix obtained by the multiplication of matrices corresponding to the individual layers.
For Configuration1 Fig. 1(a), the matrix representing each layer of A-sandwich wall are as follows.
The inner skin is represented by

$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{1}\\ \text{\hspace{0.17em}}{C}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{1}\end{array}\right]$ =$\left[\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}j\frac{{z}_{s}}{{z}_{o}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{1}\\ j\frac{{z}_{o}}{{z}_{s}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{1}\end{array}\right]$ (1)

In Configuration1, the metallic strip grating is located at the mid-plane of the core. Hence the core can be considered to be made up of two identical sections with strip grating in between them. Then the half-section of the core is represented by

$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{2}\\ {C}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{2}\end{array}\right]$ =$\left[\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}j\frac{{z}_{c}}{{z}_{o}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{2}\\ j\frac{{z}_{o}}{{z}_{c}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{2}\end{array}\right]$ (2)

Let AMS, BMS, CMS and DMS be the elements of the matrix representing metallic strip grating

$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{MS}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{MS}\\ {C}_{MS}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{MS}\end{array}\right]$ =$\left[\begin{array}{l}1\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\\ j{B}_{G}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}1\end{array}\right]$ (3)

Here BG represents the shunt susceptance of the metallic strip grating15. For perpendicular polarization, the shunt susceptance of the strip for perpendicular polarization is given by

${B}_{G}=\frac{-4p\mathrm{sec}\theta }{\lambda }\left[\left(\mathrm{ln}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{cos}ec\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\left(\frac{\pi g}{2p}\right)+G\right]$ (4)

Here the correction term is given by

$G=\frac{0.5{\left(1-{\beta }^{2}\right)}^{2}\left[\left(1-\frac{{\beta }^{2}}{4}\right)\left({C}_{1+}+{C}_{1-}\right)+4{\beta }^{2}{C}_{1+}{C}_{1-}\right]}{\left(1-\frac{{\beta }^{2}}{4}\right)+{\beta }^{2}\left(1+\frac{{\beta }^{2}}{2}-\frac{{\beta }^{4}}{8}\right)\left({C}_{1+}+{C}_{1-}\right)+2{\beta }^{6}{C}_{1+}{C}_{1-}}$    (5)

The coefficients are given by  ${C}_{1±}^{}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{{\left(\frac{p\mathrm{sin}\theta }{\lambda }±1\right)}^{2}-\frac{{p}^{2}}{{\lambda }^{2}}}}-1$ (6)   Here  $\beta =\mathrm{sin}\left(\frac{\pi w}{2p}\right)$ and n =   ±1, ±2, ±3,……..

The other half-section of the core is represented by

$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{3}\\ {C}_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{3}\end{array}\right]$ =$\left[\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}j\frac{{z}_{c}}{{z}_{o}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{3}\\ j\frac{{z}_{o}}{{z}_{c}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{3}\end{array}\right]$ (7)

The outer skin is represented by

$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{4}\\ {C}_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{4}\end{array}\right]$ =$\left[\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}j\frac{{z}_{s}}{{z}_{o}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{4}\\ j\frac{{z}_{o}}{{z}_{s}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{4}\end{array}\right]$ (8)

The radome paint is represented by

$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{5}\\ {C}_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{5}\end{array}\right]$ =$\left[\begin{array}{l}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}j\frac{{z}_{p}}{{z}_{o}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{5}\\ j\frac{{z}_{o}}{{z}_{p}}\mathrm{sin}{\Phi }_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{cos}{\Phi }_{5}\end{array}\right]$ (9)

Thus, the entire A-sandwich configuration with metallic strip grating embedded at the mid-plane of the core may be expressed as

$\left[\begin{array}{l}A\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}B\\ C\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}D\end{array}\right]$=$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{1}\\ {C}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{1}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{2}\\ {C}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{2}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}1\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\\ j{B}_{G}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}1\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\\ {C}_{3}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{3}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{4}\\ {C}_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{4}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{5}\\ {C}_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{5}\end{array}\right]$    (10)

In Configuration2,metallic strip grating is embedded in each skin-core interface Fig. 1(b). Then the entire A-sandwich radome wall with metallic strip gratings is represented by

$\left[\begin{array}{l}A\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}B\\ C\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}D\end{array}\right]$=$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{1}\\ {C}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{1}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}1\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\\ j{B}_{G}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}1\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{2}\\ {C}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{2}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}1\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}0\\ j{B}_{G}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}1\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{4}\\ {C}_{4}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{4}\end{array}\right]$$\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{5}\\ {C}_{5}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{5}\end{array}\right]$   (11)

Here  $\left[\begin{array}{l}{A}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{B}_{2}\\ {C}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{D}_{2}\end{array}\right]$

represents the core of the radome wall, which is different from that of Configuration1.
Using Eqns (10) and (11), the A, B, C, a nd D parameters of the final matrix are computed for each Configuration. The power transmission coefficient is given by

Ptr=$\left[\frac{4}{{\left(A+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}B\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}C\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}D\right)}^{2}}\right]$                                     (12)

The power reflection coefficient is given by

Prf=${\left[\frac{A\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}B\text{\hspace{0.17em}}-\text{\hspace{0.17em}}C\text{\hspace{0.17em}}-\text{\hspace{0.17em}}D}{A\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+B\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}C\text{\hspace{0.17em}}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}D}\right]}^{2}$                                              (13)

The phase distortions are determined by the insertion phase delay (IPD) of the radome wall. For the Configuration 1, two skin layers, cores sections, metallic strip grating and radome paint are cascaded. Hence the insertion phase delays for Configuration1 is given by
IPD1=$-\angle {T}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}-\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\left(2{t}_{s}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}2{t}_{c1}+{t}_{ms}+{t}_{p}\right)\mathrm{cos}\theta \text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}$ 14

Similarly, insertion phase delay for Configuration2 is given by
IPD2 =$-\angle {T}_{2}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}-\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\frac{2\pi }{\lambda }\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\left(2{t}_{s}+\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}{t}_{c2}+2{t}_{ms}+{t}_{p}\right)\mathrm{cos}\theta \text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}$  (15)

Here  and  are the phase angles associated with the voltage transmission coefficients corresponding to Configuration 1 and Configuration 2 respectively. The thicknesses of skin layers, metallic strip grating and radome paint are given by ts, tms, and tp respectively. Let tc1 be the thickness of each section of the core for Configuration 1, while tc2 be the core thickness for Configuration 2.

A comparative  study  of the EM performance of A-sandwich wall with metallic strip gratings and A-sandwich wall alone is carried out for Configuration1. The EM performance parameters are computed at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80° for perpendicular polarization over X-band frequency range. The optimized design parameters of metallic strip gratings for Configuration 1 are given in Table 1. Figures 2-4 show the EM performance characteristics of Configuration 1. It may be observed that the A-sandwich wall with metallic strip grating shows superior power transmission characteristics as compared to A-sandwich wall alone Fig. 2. The power transmission of the A-sandwich wall embedded with strip grating is well above 90 per cent at normal incidence, 45°, and 60°. But there is degradation of power transmission efficiency at high incidence angle 80°. The power reflection is very low (a desirable characteristic) for the A-sandwich wall with strip grating as compared to the A-sandwich alone wall (Figs. 3(a) and 3(d)). It is observed that the power reflection of the conventional A-sandwich structure increases with the increase in the incidence angle. TThe insertion phase delay (IPD) characteristics are shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(d). It is observed that the IPD of the A-sandwich wall embedded with strip gratings is same as that of the conventional structure at normal incidence. However, the IPD of the strip embedded structure increases with incidence angle.

Figure 2.Power transmission characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 2.Power transmission characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 2.Power transmission characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 3.Power transmission characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 3.Power transmission characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Table 1. Design parameters of metallic strip gratings .

The EM performance parameters of A-sandwich wall with metallic strip gratings embedded in each skin-core interface (Configuration 2) and A-sandwich wall alone are shown in Figs. 5 and 7. The optimized design parameters of metallic strip gratings corresponding to Configuration 2 are given in Table 1. Figure 5 show the power transmission characteristics of Configuration 2 at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. It is noted that the inclusion of metallic strip gratings at each skin-core interface improves the power transmission efficiency. The A-sandwich wall with strip gratings shows excellent power transmission characteristics (above 90%) at normal incidence. There is degradation in the power transmission efficiency of the A-sandwich wall with strip gratings at other incidence angle. However, the power transmission characteristics of A-sandwich wall with strip gratings are better than that of A-sandwich alone at all incidence angles over the X-band. The power reflection characteristics of Configuration 2 are shown in Fig. 6. The A-sandwich wall embedded with metallic strip gratings shows very low power reflection as compared to that of the conventional structure. The power reflection for Configuration 2 is very low at normal incidence, 45°, and 60°. However, the power reflection of the conventional structure increases drastically at high incidence angle 80°. The insertion phase delay characteristics of Configuration 2 are shown in Fig. 7. It is observed that the IPD of the A-sandwich wall embedded with metallic strip gratings for Configuration 2 is higher than that of A-sandwich alone at all incidence angles. It is desirable for reducing phase distortions and hence boresight error.

Figure 4. Power reflection characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60° and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 4. Power reflection characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 1) at normal incidence, 45°, 60° and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 5.Figure 5. Power reflection characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 2) at normal incidence, 45°, 60° and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 5.Figure 5. Power reflection characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 2) at normal incidence, 45°, 60° and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 6. Power reflection characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in the mid-plane of the core and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 2) at normal incidence, 45°, 60° and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 7. Insertion phase delay characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in each skin-core interface and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 2) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Figure 7. Insertion phase delay characteristics of A-sandwich radome with metallic strip gratings embedded in each skin-core interface and A-sandwich alone (Configuration 2) at normal incidence, 45°, 60°, and 80°. (Polarization: Perpendicular).

Among the two configurations considered, Configuration 1 has better EM performance characteristics as compared to Configuration 2. The average power transmission efficiency (around 85 per cent) for Configuration 1, while that of Configuration 2 is around 82 per cent. Further, the average  power reflection for Configuration 1 is nearly zero at high incidence angle 80°, while it is around 5 per cent for Configuration 2. At normal incidence, IPD of Configuration 2 is much higher than that of Configuration 1, indicating more phase distortions.

The application of metallic strip gratings for improving the EM performance characteristics of A-sandwich radome over X-Band is established in this work.  It is observed that the novel A-sandwich wall configurations (Configuration 1 and Configuration2) offer better EM performance characteristics as compared to the conventional A-sandwich wall with optimized core thickness. Considering the EM performance characteristics, Configuration1 is preferable to Configuration2.  Further regarding fabrication aspects, Configuration1 is desirable as only one set of strip grating has to be embedded in the structure.  The present work also shows that A-sandwich wall with metallic strip gratings is a better choice for both the normal-incidence (i.e., cylindrical or spherical) radomes, and the highly streamlined (e.g. conical, ogival) nosecone radomes.

2.     Walton, Jr. J.D. Techniques for airborne radome design. AFAL Report. Report No. 45433, 1966, 105-108.

3.     Crone, G.A.E.; Rudge, A.W. & Taylor, G.N. Design and performance of airborne radomes: A review. IEE Proc., 1981, 128(7), 451-464. [Full text via CrossRef]

4.     Cary, R.H.J. Radomes, In The Handbook of Antenna Design. Peter Peregrinus, London, 1982.

5.     Frenkel, A. Thick metal dielectric window. Electronics Letters, 2001, 37(23), 1374-1375. [Full text via CrossRef]

6.     Munk, B.A. Frequency selective surfaces - Theory and design. Wiley, New York, 2005.

7.     Lin, B.-Q.; Li, F.; Zheng, Q.-R. & Zen, Y.-S. Design and simulation of a miniature thick-screen frequency selective surface radome. Progress Electromagnetics Research, 2009, 138, 537-553. [Full text via CrossRef]

8.     Nair, R.U.; Madhumitha, J. & Jha, R.M. Broadband EM performance characteristics of single square loop FSS embedded monolithic radome. Int. J. Antenn. Propag., 2013, 1-8. [Full text via CrossRef]

9.     Latrach, M.; Rmili, H.; Sabatier, C.; Seguenot, E. & Toutain, S. Design of a new type of metamaterial radome at low frequencies. Microwave Optical Technol. Letters, 2010, 52(5), 1119-1123. [Full text via CrossRef]

10.   Basiry, R.; Abiri, H. & Yahaghi, A. Electromagnetic performance analysis of omega type metamaterial radome. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng., 2011, 21(6), 665-673. [Full text via CrossRef]

11.   Narayan, S.; Shamala, J.B.; Nair, R.U. & Jha, R.M. Electromagnetic performance analysis of novel multiband metamaterial FSS for millimeter wave radome applications. Computers, Materials  Continua, 2012, 31(1), 1-16.

12.   Kozakoff, D.J. Analysis of radome enclosed antennas. Artech House, Norwood, 2010.

13.   Chen, F.; Shen, Q. & Zhang, L. Electromagnetic optimal design and preparation of broadband ceramic radome material with graded porous structure. Progress Electromagnetics Research, 2010, 105, 445-461. [Full text via CrossRef]

14.   Pei, Y.M.; Zeng, A.M.; Zhou, L.C.; Zhang, R.B. & Xu, K.X. Electromagnetic optimal design for dual-band radome wall with alternating layers of staggered composite and Kagome lattice structure. Progress Electromagnetics Research, 2012, 122, 437-452. [Full text via CrossRef]

15.          Lee, C.K. & Langley, R.J. Equivalent-circuit models for frequency-selective surfaces at oblique angles of incidence. IEE Proc., Pt. H, 1985,18(6), 395-399. [Full text via CrossRef]